conuly: (Default)
Communities Learn the Good Life Can Be a Killer

Cars Kill Cities

Both are filled with comments along the lines of "Public transportation in my area is terrible, therefore there is no possible way to make good public transportation, and if people wanted public transportation they'd take it instead of driving cars, so clearly they don't."

Aside from the fact that you can't buy what they don't sell (so you can't switch to good bus service if your area is invested in the idea that this is impossible and nobody wants it anyway), you have to love the narrow little assumption that because this person or that one hasn't seen something, it can't exist. You just want to pat them on their little heads! Twits.
conuly: Good Omens quote: "Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous!" (armageddon)
Specifically, the AAA is considering changing their recommendation to encourage parents to rear-face their kids until the age of two.

They're about a decade behind the times here (although apparently they're still just ahead of the AAP on this), but you know, it's something.

However, you'll note that over at Pat's Papers he's going "I'm doubtful it'd work for two year olds, they'll complain about what they can't see".

OMG, did that ever set my internet argument senses tingling! Fortunately, armed with years of experience on LJ I was able, within minutes, to find a video showing the view from a rear-facing carseat. Wow, look - the baby can see things! I also can find videos showing older children in RF-carseats interacting with other family members, sitting comfortably or sleeping even though their legs are crossed or tucked up or kicked up on the seat back (including one where the poster specifically commented that now that her child is bigger he complains about his feet dangling, and he never complained before!), and generally being happy.

Which wipes out most of the common arguments. NOT the one about space in the car (there probably are ways to make your rear-facing carseat take up less space, or more compact ones, but I don't know) and NOT the one about what to do if your child really DOES scream all the time in the carseat, but not when forward-facing. (In real life, I understand that this can be a problem. However, I do not think it is responsible to mention it as a HUGE problem when you haven't tried it and you're talking to other people who haven't tried it. Don't discourage them first! Not unless you're selling condoms, in which case the cost of carseats can be a selling point.)

The thing is, when it comes to really fast really heavy vehicles? Safety actually comes first. This is not a "OMG, if I let my kid play outside she'll be kidnapped and killed!!!!" issue because that actually doesn't happen very often. And it's not a "OMG, there's no WAY I can let my 10 year old stay in the house alone, she'll burn the house down!!!" because if that's actually likely to happen then you and your kid probably need help. Car crashes, by contrast, are actually THE number one killer of children under the age of 15 (that is, non-drivers), killing about 2,000 kids yearly. And they seriously injure or permanently disable countless others.

Proper car seat safety doesn't unreasonably limit your child (I mean, they're in a CAR, it's not like they could move that much anyway) and it could save your kid's life. Maybe not in the worst, most epic disaster ever... but certainly in many more garden-variety crashes. (And yeah - sure, all us people posting online today survived bad carseats and no carseats. However (and I hate to use this argument, but I'm going to!), plenty of other children didn't. Unless you expect them to post from beyond the grave or something...?)
conuly: image of Elisa Mazda (Gargoyles) - "Watcher of the City" (watcher of the city)
THIS is a good reason to jump onto the tracks, to save somebody's life.

There is absolutely NO other justified reason. Whatever it is you dropped, it isn't worth your life.

Read more... )
conuly: Quote from Veronica Mars - "Sometimes I'm even persnickety-ER" (persnickety)
One on the effects of wi-fi on school buses in Arizona

Read more... )

On a non-standard gender marriage in Malawi. It's not clear from the article if this is a same-sex marriage or if one of the partners is transgendered.

Interesting quote: Aninsia Kachepa, Mr. Chimbalanga’s older sister, wept into her blouse at the simple mention of her jailed brother. “I have never heard of this homosexuality, and I am still not understanding,” she said.

“Tell me, how is it physically possible, one man having sex with another?”


It's not as strange as some people think, I'm sure.

Read more... )

One I thought I posted before, but can't find about medicine in Cuba.

Read more... )

I have one more coming, but it's long.
conuly: image of Elisa Mazda (Gargoyles) - "Watcher of the City" (watcher of the city)
I saw water fountains - real fountains with real water that gets cold when you run it (and you CAN run it, WE have no drought!) and tastes like water instead of like some unholy combination of salt and mud... oh!

Poor Ana had a fit the day we got to California because of the water quality (and the fact that she was extremely tired and hungry). She and Evangeline had so much juice...! Day before we left, I had a bottle of water I couldn't open. My mother couldn't open it. My aged grandmother (pushing 90 now!) got it in a few seconds. We, uh, loosened it for her.

Our garden is terribly overgrown, but that's all right. We seem to have obtained a new form of mint while we were gone that's taking over EVERYthing. Mint will do that, but this is a bit much even for mint - and I'm not even sure what kind of mint it is! Could be mountain mint, but I'm sure I decided *not* to plant that....

Our flight was fairly uneventful. Our flight out - oy. Oh dear god. I asked my mother in the airport terminal NOT to buy the headphones, feeling that they're altogether too interested in TV as it is and conscious of the many things I'd picked up to entertain them. So she... bought them anyway. And gave them to the kids first thing, as SOON as they sat down, before I asked them.

Naturally they squabbled over watching the same show (or not) and I had to find the channel for them, and I had to check periodically to make sure it was reasonably child-appropriate, and they were cranky and annoying the whole way. My mother said she thought she'd be able to help me in the flight - ha! She sat behind me and never switched seats halfway through like she PROMISED she would. Never had a chance to read any book or eat anything of my own.

Our flight back, I knew my mother would still be in California. This time, I got to make the choice - No. Headphones. My lovely mother goes "They'll scream!" at me. How insulting! Not only insulting my judgment - and I do like to believe I know my nieces well enough - but also of the girls. How does she think anybody managed before inflight TV? Does she think we had that when we flew across the ocean?

Guess what? True to *my* predictions they were darlings the whole flight, they helped each other with their craft supplies (Klutz books, how I love you!), they were friendly and sweet, and the crew went out of their way to compliment their behavior.

TV does not make them behave better. (Duh.)

In the airport (I guess I'm doing this backwards) I got to listen to a totally asinine lecture on Evangeline's choice of underwear... or the lack of underwear under her shorts. Apparently you could see that if she flopped backwards and you looked. Whoops.

"Don't you KNOW that children are KILLED every DAY and there are PEDOphiles?" "What, here in the airport kids are killed every day?" "No, not in the airport". Given that she was TSA I decided to stop the conversation there and not point out that, frankly, I simply don't care unless children are routinely being snatched from that particular airport. Isn't that what security is for, anyway? (And even if they were - guess what? It wasn't going to happen. They were holding my hands until we got to the plane, then they were going to sit right next to me.) And what did she think, that cotton panties have magic powers to repel evildoers? They're panties, not chastity belts! Or maybe that pervs only go after children without panties. If *that* is the case, they're even weirder than I thought. Bit of a long shot, waiting for a kid to come along without the appropriate amount of underwear. (Admittedly, I would've put her in panties instead of just the shorts if I'd realized we could have this problem, but not out of fear. I just don't like her flashing people.) I also didn't mention to the TSA woman her grasp of the statistics of the situation was totally flawed. I was Being Pragmatic. (And she meant well, in her wrongheaded way.)

I have to wonder why she was looking at Evangeline's crotch in the first place, though. I mean, even when the kiddo flopped on the floor it wasn't that obvious until you looked for it....
conuly: (Default)
One about choosing a trade instead of years in college - haven't read the whole thing yet.

Read more... )

One about interning at an organic farm

Read more... )

One about the very firstest Jewish American Girl doll ever.


Read more... )

An article on Stapleton, where I live! Evangeline and Ana have really enjoyed seeing all the sailors for Fleet Week, which kinda changes my ambivalence towards the whole occasion (any occasion that requires the use of multiple flyovers while also crowding the Ferry doesn't exactly get the thumbs up from me). Yesterday the boat was a full 15 minutes late, so we took car service home. The nieces called out the window "Hi sailor! Bye sailor!" at all of them passing, and they spent an amusing several minutes singing an impromptu song about the "three sailors" they saw when walking.

Read more... )

One on how proposals to legalize gay marriage in NY (yay) are having trouble finding opposition. Good. I cannot believe the nerve of some groups trying to call themselves "pro-family". Fucking twits.

Read more... )

An article on recent urban planning in NYC. Go look at it, it's got a nifty graphic with a before and after view of a street in Brooklyn

Read more... )
conuly: (Default)
This is no surprise. Even without the irony of my excitement over the new South Ferry station (which has not diminished a whit), I'm not surprised. There's a post about it here.

But the MTA needs the money. Should've added tolls to the bridges, that's the sensible thing to do. Should be better subsidized, that's what the government's for. Can't blame the MTA for that. And I pay attention - for all people are talking about how service sucks, and it's better in other cities, I remember what it was like when I was a kid. It's better now than it was then. I don't know about other cities, but in *this* city the MTA has gotten better. (This may not mean much, but it's still *true*, I do believe.)

Noticed something else. Every train - EVERY train - that I go on now has signs up about the (then proposed) fare increase, saying that with inflation and all fares are actually cheaper now than they were when they were $1.25. That might be true, though I don't see how think they'll get anybody to believe it, or care if they do. But do you know why these signs are up in every train? It's not because they're so big on propagandizing us. It's because a lot of the adspace, for the past several years now, is taken up with public service ads. I don't think this is because the MTA thinks we really need public poetry. I think it's because, for whatever reason, the space isn't selling and they feel they need to put *something* there. So they're not getting as much ad revenue as they really ought to either. That in and of itself kinda indicates the sort of dire straits they're in.

I'm still upset, though. Who can afford another fifty cents a fare? In a way, it was better before unlimiteds - you don't want to pay the fare, you walk. It's easy to save money when you walk instead of taking the train or the bus two stops or three stops or whatever your walking limit is. But now everybody knows that if you're travelling regularly the unlimited card is cheaper, and once you buy it you have no easy way to save that little bit of cash. (Okay, it's already saved through buying the unlimited instead of the pay-per-ride, but that's not the point, exactly.)
conuly: (Default)
They're constantly running articles on the subject. Well, frequently anyway.

This one is very cute, and really, being in picture format, defies being copypasted. You have to click to read.
conuly: (Default)
Clicky!

There's also a related blog post here. In the comments, some people are complaining about long walks with lots of young kids - not enough space in the stroller, and so on.

Now, I don't know much about strollers, but I do know that I often see kids from daycares out for the day, and they're transported in these daycare strollers - four, six, or eight seats, often with the ability to swivel so the kids can be seated all looking at each other or all facing forwards. They're about as compact as you can expect from a stroller designed for a half-a-class-size, too.
conuly: (Default)
And why it (apparently) works

This is very interesting to me in light of news that the MTA wants to increase fares. Again.

(It would be even more interesting if I saw any evidence that they wanted to increase fares for any purpose other than, ultimately, increasing their own paychecks.)

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 01:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios